Category Archives: Pacific

Recalling the splendour of Samoan oratory: Lauaki Namulau’ulu Mamoe

To celebrate le vaiaso o le gagana Sämoa (Sämoan language week) the Pacific Cultures curators are highlighting stories related to cultural treasures from Sämoa.

Portrait of Lauaki Namulau'ulu Mamoe; 1909; O.001123; Te Papa

Portrait of Lauaki Namulau’ulu Mamoe; 1909; O.001123; Te Papa

This image of Lauaki Namulau’ulu Mamoe (b. 1850s? – d. 1915) taken by photographer Thomas Andrew is dated 1909. This was the same year Lauaki was exiled to Saipan, in the Northern Marianas by the Imperial German government in Samoa.

Lauaki was known throughout Samoa for “his mastery of history and legend, for his talents as a speaker and political negotiator, and for his prowess in war” (Davidson 1970: 267-268). He went on to lead an important political movement, called the Mau of Pule (the Opinion of Pule). The term Pule was the collective name, given to a number of influential orator groups on Savai`i.  The tulafale and tulafale ali`i of Pule spoke for the principal nu`u and district of Savai`i as a whole, and served it’s ranking ali`i.

The aim of the Mau of  Pule was to challenge German rule, and try to secure for Samoans more involvement in their own affairs of government. Under Lauaki’s leadership, the movement was initially successful, but struggled due to factionalism. In 1909 and because of his resistance to the colonial authority, Dr Wilhelm Solf the German Governor at the time took Lauaki into custody. Later Lauaki along with nine other chiefs, and their families were exiled to Saipan in the Mariana Islands, as punishment for refusing to give up their opposition. Six years later in 1915, the New Zealand government sent a ship to bring Lauaki and his supporters home. But tragically Lauaki died during the return voyage from dysentery.

Writing in 1970, historian James W Davidson noted that Lauaki Namulau`ulu Mamoe was still well remembered with respect: “In Saipan, where the exiles maintained the conventions of their homeland in a village they built near Tanapag, the commanding figure of their leader has not yet been forgotten. In Samoa, old men recall the splendours of his oratory” (Davidson 1970: 298).

Click on this link to view an image of Lauaki and his family: http://www.flickr.com/photos/15693951@N00/2673833385/in/photostream/

References

Davidson, J. “Lauaki Namulau’ulu Mamoe: a traditionalist in Samoan politics” Davidson, J. and Scarr, D (eds.) Pacific Islands Portraits.  (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1970).

Hempenstall, P. and Mochida, P. The lost man: Wilhelm Solf in German history. (Wiesbaden: Harassowitz, 2005)

Hempenstall, P. and Rutherford, N.  Protest and dissent in the colonial Pacific. (Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies of the University of the South Pacific, 1984)

Meleisea, M. The making of modern Samoa.((Suva: Institute of Pacific Studies of the University of the South Pacific, 1987)

The `alia – double hulled sailing canoe of Samoa

To celebrate le vaiaso o le gagana Sämoa (Sämoan language week) the Pacific Cultures curators are highlighting stories related to cultural treasures from Sämoa.

Today, I have selected this image of an ‘alia. In the 1800s, the most prized and finely crafted sea going vessels were `alia. In terms of design ‘alia the equivalent of the Fijian drua and Tongan kalia could be very large in size. They had a large sail and two plank built hulls joined together by a deck, almost like a modern day catamaran. As well as being used for transportation, ‘alia were also used in times of war, with some `alia even carrying cannons[i]. One `alia seen in Tutuila in the year 1862 was 70 feet long five feet deep and able to transport up to one hundred men.  It was also described as sailing “round a vessel in which the consular agent was a passenger, going eight knots”[ii]. So despite their great size they were very manoeuvrable. 

This photo appears in Kramer, A, translation T Verhaaven, “The Samoa Islands”, Auckland: Polynesian Press, 1994, p.299, with the title “The catamaran Fa’a'inaelo of Olosega on Manu’a, now fallen to ruin”. Olosega is one of the most eastern islands in the Samoan archipelago. When Kramer travelled to Manu’a, he went to Olosega and found this vessel in fragments. Some of those fragments were ladged with the Museum in Stuttgart, Germany

At the end of the 1800s  the remnants of at least four Samoan `alia can be verified. There was the Fa`ainaelo photographed at Olosega, Sau`aitagata of Saleaula in Savai`i, Fa`ataugali of Safune,[iii]  Sanaitopata, near Leotele in Savai`i, and one photographed with over forty passengers on board and said to have been presented to the German Imperial Governor Solf around the turn of the century[iv] 

The building of large va`a such as the `alia utilised the skills of many other specialists such as sail makers, rope makers and paddle makers and was probably a great strain on the resources of a village or district. Only strong leaders could organise such energy and resources to take on a building project of this size. The gift of an `alia to Governor Solf would have been both expensive and prestigious. Sadly due to the high costs of transporting the vessel to Germany it rotted away on the beach at Sämoa’s capital, Apia. This was probably the last of the full size `alia to be seen. 

Here we feature two items from Te Papa collections – a photograph of an ‘alia from the 1800s and a model of a drua the Fijian equivalent of an ‘alia.

 


[i] Pritchard in Kramer A 1995 page 302

[ii] Hood T.H.1863 page 100

[iii] These three were sighted and examined Kramer who gives a description of the building of an `alia. see Kramer A. 1995 Vol 2.page 300

[iv] Haddon J.C. and Hornell J 1991 page 242

Selu la’au (wooden comb) from Sämoa

To celebrate le vaiaso o le gagana Sämoa (Samoan language week) the Pacific Cultures curators are highlighting stories related to cultural treasures from Sämoa.

Selu la’au (wooden comb); FE000887; Gift of Alexander Turnbull, 1913; Te Papa

Selu la’au (wooden comb); FE000887; Gift of Alexander Turnbull, 1913; Te Papa

Selu la’au or selu pau as it is commonly known, were ornamental carved wooden combs made from the late 1800s using metal tools. A variety of wood was used; pau or manapau (Mammea odorata), toi (Alphitonia zizyphoides), toa (Casuarina equisetifolia) or ifilele (Intsia bijuga). These wood species were also used to carve household furniture, va’a (canoe) and foe (paddles).

To carve the selu la’au designs, a fretwork technique was used which required cutting holes into the piece of thin wood to create intricate patterns. Selu la’au were placed in the hair for ornamental purposes.   

Portrait of a Samoan woman; O.001021; Te Papa

Portrait of a Samoan woman; O.001021; Te Papa

This selu dates from the 1800s and was gifted to the museum by Alexander Turnbull in 1913.

 

Remembering Malifa School in Samoa

To celebrate le vaiaso o le gagana Sämoa (Samoan language week) I have decided to draw attention to a small handbook which was gifted to the museum in 1954.

Malifa handbook; FE010588; Te Papa

Malifa handbook; FE010588; Te Papa

The front cover of this handbook indicates that it was presented to Mr and Mrs D A J Rutherford in 1936. The Rutherfords had arrived in Sämoa in 1919 when Mr Rutherford or Latafoti, as he was also known, was appointed superintendent of schools. Previously he had been headmaster of Highcliff School near Dunedin, before taking up his position as headmaster of Leififi School, the first government school in Sämoa established for local European children and children of expatriates.

Malifa was the second government school established during the German period in Sämoa, and was started by church minister Faletoese in 1908. It was intended for Samoan children. In 1909 a boarding school for the sons of matai (chiefs) was added to the Malifa compound. It was the first school to organise a kilikiti (cricket) team in 1921. During Latafoti’s time, a number of Grade 2 schools was set up. However student numbers in classes continued to rise due to increasing interest in education.

Malifa handbook; FE010588; Te Papa

Malifa handbook; FE010588; Te Papa

The handbook has hand-drawn images on the front cover and seven pages of handwritten text inside. It describes a series of small models of household utensils and furniture indexed from A to V that was presented to the Rutherfords. Some of the items included; ‘au (tattooing instrument), aufana (bow and arrow), falalili’i (mat), pate (cricket bat) and to’i (stone adze).

This handbook was presented to Mr and Mrs Rutherford upon their leaving Sämoa in 1936. Written by a student, this object is a good example of how New Zealand policies in the early 1900s influenced Sämoa’s educational system.

Fresh on the bookshelf – Tangata o le Moana: New Zealand and the People of the Pacific

Tangata o le Moana: New Zealand and the People of the Pacific, Te Papa Press, 2012

Aotearoa New Zealand is home to a large Pasifika population. This illustrated collection of essays is the first of its kind to tell their stories – from the legendary feats of the ancestors of modern Māori, to the politically explosive dawn raids of the 1970s, and beyond.

This beautiful book is lavishly illustrated with hundreds of historical and contemporary photos and archival documents. Drawing on a rich cache of oral history, it is a fresh and surprising record of over a thousand years of discovery, encounter, and cultural exchange. The research for this book commenced in 2003 and produced a major  exhibition which opened in 2007.

For more information about the book click on the image above.

To view details about the exhibition Tangata o le Moana: The story of Pacific people in New Zealand  click on the image below.

Mannequin (Marquesan warrior), 1959, White, Gordon, Wellington. © Te Papa.

The Conservation of Poedua – Part 15

One of the most rewarding stages of the treatment is the varnishing of the painting.  The new varnish layer returns the colours of the painting to the saturation and depth which were intended by the artist and it is when we feel like we are on the home stretch of the treatment!

We use a synthetic resin that was specially created for the conservation profession, which has very similar optical qualities to the natural resins that John Webber would have originally used.  It has favourable ageing characteristics, yellowing much less than the natural resins and remaining easily reversible with age.

The first layer of varnish was brushed and as can be seen in the photograph below, the change was dramatic.

 

The early stages of the brush varnishing of the painting. Photograph taken by Katherine Campbell, © Te Papa.

Once the varnish has dried and hardened the next stage of the treatment can begin.  Retouching, also known as inpainting, is carried out in areas of loss and abrasion, with the aim of reintegrating these areas so as not to draw the eye of the viewer.  We want you to see the beautiful painting, without the distraction of areas of deterioration.  We take care not to cover areas of original paint, our aim is not to return the appearance of the panting to its original state or make it look-like-new, the natural signs of age are retained and returning the appearance to the artist’s original intention is our aim.

Retouching along the bottom edge of the painting (with my feet up!). Photograph taken by Matthew O'Reilly, © Te Papa.

Once the retouching was complete a final spray varnish layer was applied to ensure an even level of gloss and saturation across the surface.

The painting was returned to its frame which has also undergone restoration that Matthew will be blogging about soon.

After just over a 12 months work, the treatment of Poedua is finally finished.  The painting will be put on display in Toi Te Papa on level 5 this week and we hope you get a chance to come and see it soon.

 

2010-0029-1; Poedua (Poetua), daughter of Oreo, chief of Ulaietea, one of the Society Isles; 1785; Webber, John. After treatment. Photograph taken by Kate Whitley, © Te Papa.

Katherine and I have enjoyed keeping you up-to-date with the treatment of this painting and hope that you have enjoyed it too!  We will continue to blog when exciting things come through the paintings conservation lab that are worthy of sharing with you!

The Conservation of Poedua – Part 14

 

We have had a very busy start to 2012, we have been working to have Poedua ready for display in March and preparing a number of paintings for the upcoming touring exhibition Angels and Aristocrats.

After the painting was re-stretched following the structural treatment, the old restorations including overpaint and old fills were removed.  The old fills and retouching were poorly matched to the original paint layer, in colour and texture, and in areas were broader than the damages, extending over areas of original paint.

A detail photograph of the old restorations over an old damage at the proper right inside elbow. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, © Te Papa.

 

After the knowledge gained during the varnish removal and a number of further tests we determined that the only safe method for removing the old restorations was mechanically.  This involves very carefully scratching and chipping the additions away from the original layers.  This is done with small scalpels and dental tools under the stereo microscope.  It is very fine work and requires and strong and steady hand!

A detail of the same area as above after the old overpaint and fill material had been removed. The damage and loss to the original paint layer is revealed. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, © Te Papa.

 

As you can imagine this is quite a time consuming process – each movement removing a barely perceptible amount, a square centimetre can take an hour or more.

 

Once all the old retouchings have been removed we can see the painting in its barest state – all that is left is the artists work and with the damages and deterioration exposed.  We record this with photographs before the next stage of restoration begins which involves adding to the painting to ensure the work reads according to the artist’s intent.

Overall image showing the complete clean - all surface dirt, varnish and old restorations have been removed. The damages and deterioration in the paint layer are exposed. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, © Te Papa.

 

The first stage of restoration is the filling of the losses in the paint layer.  Many were revealed after the removal of the old restorations and the tiny pin hole loses caused by water damage in the lower centre of the painting were also filled.  We use commercial chalk based filler which has been tested and proven to have favourable ageing qualities, remaining reversible with time.

Overall image after the new fills have been added to the losses in the paint layer. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, © Te Papa.

 

It is very important to emulate the paint layer texture in the fills and in the cause of this painting the texture is predominately the twill canvas texture showing through the very thin paint layer.  Under raking light we use small spatulas, scalpels and dental tools to create the required texture.

Detail of the same area as above after the new fill material has been added. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, © Te Papa.

 

The painting is now ready for the first layer of varnish!

Come and hear about the conservation of the painting when Katherine and I present our work on Monday 5 March at Te Papa.  Find out more here.

The Conservation of Poedua – Part 13

The varnish removal is finally complete!  The detail of the brushwork in the Poedua’s face and hair have been revealed and we are one step closer to getting this painting ready for display.

The canvas face down on the table with the stretcher removed (which can be seen on another table in the top right). The leather weights hold the canvas in position while it is loose. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

The canvas face down on the table with the stretcher removed (which can be seen on another table in the top right). The leather weights hold the canvas in position while it is loose. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

During the varnish removal we discovered a damage on the stretcher which meant that we needed to take the canvas off the stretcher for structural repairs.  We were hoping to avoid this step to maintain the historical integrity of the original attachment of the canvas to the stretcher, but in the end the care of the painting would be compromised if we did not.

We lay the painting face down on a clean table covered with Tyvek and carefully removed the original tacks from the tacking edges and lifted the stretcher away from the canvas.  There was an enormous amount of dust caked onto the canvas and the stretcher member at all sides, particularly at the bottom edge.  This gave us opportunity to clean the canvas and the stretcher in these areas.

At the bottom edge of the canvas lots of caked-on dirt was found which was caught behind the stretcher member. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

Even more dirt in the bottom corner, plus some pieces of straw (most of the straw was removed when the painting was still in London - see previous post). Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

Even more dirt in the bottom corner, plus some pieces of straw (most of the straw was removed when the painting was still in London - see previous post). Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

Next we attached a strip lining to the canvas for two reasons, to add structural support to the brittle and fragile original tacking edges, especially in the corners and also to allow us to have something to hold onto when restretching the canvas onto the stretcher.

The join in the stretcher and the offending split in the wood. Photograph taken by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

In the above photograph the damage to the stretcher can be seen.  This part of the join was just too thin and has split apart.  The split area was pressing against the back of the canvas which was why it was essential to remove the canvas from the stretcher for this repair.  We discussed options for the structural repair of the stretcher with our object support team and decided on removing part of the stretcher and replacing it with a wooden insert.

A small section of the stretcher surrounding the damage was removed using chisels. Photograph taken by James Kirk, 2011. © Te Papa.

The repaired join after the wooden insert has been attached. Photograph by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

The repaired join after the wooden insert has been attached. Photograph by Melanie Carlisle, 2011. © Te Papa.

This interventive treatment was seen as the best way of maintaining the historical integrity of the original stretcher.  In the past the original stretcher may not have been giving the same importance and would have been replaced with a new and improved stretcher but modern conservation practices dictate a much different approach.

The stretcher was repaired, cleaned of the dust and dirt and reassembled.  We restretched the canvas, attaching the strip lining at the reverse of the stretcher using stainless steel staples.  The original tacks were cleaned or loose dust, dirt and corrosion in an ultra-sonic bath and then replaced in their original holes in the canvas and the stretcher.

Katherine and I restretching the canvas and attaching the strip lining canvas at the back with staples. Photograph taken by Drew Ward, 2011. © Te Papa.

Katherine and I restretching the canvas and attaching the strip lining canvas at the back with staples. Photograph taken by Drew Ward, 2011. © Te Papa.

The tension of the canvas has been improved and the fragile tacking edges are now supported by the strip lining.  Next is the removal of the old overpaint and fills which we will discuss in our next post in the early new year.

The Conservation of Poedua – Part 12

Hello. Matthew O’Reilly, Framer of Paintings, returning to the subject of Poedua, and particularly, her lovely frame.

This is my second post about the conservation of the frame. The first one was in June, and it dealt with understanding the frame and its history well enough, and identifying the questions to be answered, before and so that, appropriate decisions could be made about the course of treatment of the dirty and damaged, but beautiful and historic frame. I have been kept from beginning the treatment until about a month ago, and have been working on it intermittently since.

In my first post I noted a previous restoration on the outer sides of the frame, a regilding over a new layer of gesso and red bole. (Gesso: white chalk and rabbit skin glue; and bole: clay and rabbit skin glue — materials traditionally part of gilding systems on wooden furniture, frames, etc.)  I had noted from the beginning, the use of  “bronze” (which is actually brass!) paint here and there to cover damages to the gilding and gesso underneath, and noted further similar damages to the surface made since the use of the paint. I had noticed holes in the surface and in the wood on the back showing European woodworm attack (rather like borer-holes only a little larger in size). 

Since turning my attention back to the frame I have discovered that the front of the frame has largely all been regilded whether at the same time as the outer side regilding or on a separate occasion. One difference is that there is no additional gesso and bole layer on the carved details on the front, but signs of some partial regessoing on the flats. The best thing about not being regessoed is the retention of the detail in the carving, and most of the subtlety of form in the profile.

As has been shown quite frequently in examining older frames, the historical restoration involving regilding appears to have been a mixture of expediency (time spent = money spent) and the attention to respectful appearance (appropriate materials and technique). The front of the frame seems to have been regilded using the same methods as the original, as opposed to the far less subtle treatment of the forms on the outer facing surfaces. Later use of bronze paint to cover small damages is an example of still greater expediency with a poorer outcome: the paint also covers adjacent surfaces that were in otherwise reasonable condition, and the paint has gradually changed in colour to the very dull green that you can see here and there in the images below.

In the interim, the decision was made to return the frame as best we could to a level of brightness (the virtue of its covering of gold leaf) commensurate with the return of the painting from its darkened state, by cleaning the surface appropriately, so that the painting and frame would present in a unified manner once back on exhibition.

Given that the painting itself is becoming lighter as Katherine and Melanie find their way down to the original colour and tonality of the paint, as they remove the historical layers of dirt to reveal the painting closer to the intended appearance of John Webber, then it follows that the frame should also rediscover more of its earlier colour and tone. A frame importantly serves the aesthetic requirements of the painting it encloses as well as connecting it to the aesthetic requirements of the milieu in which it once resided. Indeed it is probably now the only evidence of that milieu.

As you see from the earliest images of the frame the dirt was unevenly distributed across the frame. Bearing in mind that the frame is fairly big at about 1650 mm high, there was a graduated appearance from least dirty on the upper and high on the right members (i.e. brightest), to most on the lower member (i.e. least visible gilding), and showing some difference in the amount of dirt also from right to left. I decided not to attempt a wholesale removal of the later regilding, since reasonably large areas of it, especially in the upper parts were in good condition, but rather to retain what was still good in it, and then to restore where necessary to a point of reintegration.

It was first necessary to define the different methods of gilding utilised on the frame, in order to decide which cleaning material to use. The unadorned surfaces are all gilded using water gilding while the carved work is mostly gilded with oil size; the later regilding is consistent with the original in the techniques employed. I decided to clean the carved, oil-gilt parts first and it is this I am working on at present.

So I have begun cleaning the grimy and often hardened sooty materials from the carved parts, discovering that the worst areas, mostly towards the lower section, have some damages that reach right through the various layers, with multiple interactions between the layers and the different materials of the original and later restoration additions and dirty surface depositions as far as the chalk or gesso, making an uncomplicated removal of the dirt impossible in many places.

Lower member centre-right during swab cleaning. Photograph by Matthew O'Reilly. © Te Papa.

I am using on the oil-gilt carved parts an acqueous cleaning agent applied with a cottonwool swab. This has shown to be effective in most parts but there have remained some more intractable areas of hardened deposits including flyspots, and places where the interaction through the surface layers mentioned above has left those layers physically and visually compromised. These parts have required some mechanical picking with a metal tool to smooth the degraded materials and remove the acretions sufficiently, so that when the reintegration is complete, the frame will once again present the painting acceptably.

Left member centre, showing a typical area of surface damage. Photograph by Matthew O'Reilly. © Te Papa.

Still to come: included in the visual reintegration of the frame surface will be the consolidation of various areas above the wooden carcase, particularly the gesso substrate where in some places the glue binder has broken down and is no longer holding well. This problem has apparently been suffered by the frame for a long period of time judging from the numerous small losses of surface material, which long ago gave rise to the use of the bronze paint, now green. And one of the corners will need to be disassembled and realigned, requiring in the process at least one other corner to come apart, before being put together again. But more of this aspect of the treatment in a later post.

The Conservation of Poedua – Part 11

The varnish removal of Poedua is progressing slowly and painstakingly and we are now almost halfway through this important part of the treatment.  As we have mentioned before, removal of discoloured varnish can have a dramatic effect on the overall balance, colour and depth of a painting.  Because discoloured varnishes like Poedua’s are usually a yellow-brown colour, they tend to reinforce warm tones but counteract the cooler colours such as some greens, whites and cooler blues.

Flowers before cleaning

This image shows Poedua's face and the flowers pre treatment - before surface cleaning and varnish removal. Photograph taken by Michael Hall, 2011 © Te Papa

Every week we are recovering more of the artist’s original paint from beneath the discoloured varnish and overpaints and we have made some nice discoveries.  Most recently, we have revealed the beautiful colours and brush-stroke detail of the flowers in Poedua’s hair. 

Poedua flower after cleaning

In this image after cleaning, you can now see much more detail in the brush-work of the artist and appreciate all the colours of his palette. Photograph by Katherine Campbell, 2011 © Te Papa

Before we cleaned them, the flowers were quite dark and a little cloudy, making them a bit difficult  to interpret.  Now that the surface dirt and varnish has been removed you can see the lovely detail of the brush-work and full range of colours employed by Webber.

Poedua's flower after cleaning

This image shows the difference in appearance after cleaning of Poedua's hair, face and the flower. Photograph by Katherine Campbell, 2011 © Te Papa

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 281 other followers