Dr Hamish Campbell, Te Papa’s geologist in residence from GNS Science, talks about the news that intrigued the world in February 2017 – that it can legitimately be claimed that Zealandia is a distinct continent.
Did you hear? There is a new continent on planet Earth.
Crazy stuff! How could there be in this day and age?! It simply doesn’t make sense. The last continent to be discovered was Antarctica, surely, in the 1820s.
This news story gripped the media globally in early February this year (2017). And it’s thought the story reached around one billion people.
It all began in Australia when the news media picked up on a scholarly scientific article in GSA Today, a high-profile American journal published by the Geological Society of America. To the astonishment of most Australians, a ‘new’ continent, named Zealandia, had been recognised just off their east coast!
In a way it was old news in New Zealand because it was first named in the scientific literature in 1995 by American scientist Bruce Luyendyk, a professor of geology at the University of California in Santa Barbara. At the time, he was involved in research in Antarctica and needed a useful name for an extensive tract of the Earth’s crust that related to the New Zealand region. Needless to say, he named it after New Zealand.
Since 1995, ‘Zealandia’ has become a fixture in our geological nomenclature. It struck a chord with New Zealand geologists and indeed the wider public. So much so that Te Papa embraced the concept and ran with it in an upgrade of the Awesome Forces exhibition in 2004, and the old Karori Wildlife Reserve in Wellington changed its name to ‘Zealandia’ to better reflect the ancient Zealandian heritage of New Zealand’s native plants and animals.
What is a continent?
The main reason for a late 20th century recognition of a ‘new’ continent has to do with how continents are defined. As luck would have it, there is no scientific definition. All that exists is the meaning offered in the English Oxford Dictionary.
Geologists have grasped the nettle, so to speak, and have offered a sensible but peculiarly geological definition as follows: “A continent is a large tract of continental crust that exceeds three million square kilometres.” Zealandia squeaks in with 4.9 million square kilometres.
The most significant aspect of this definition is that it does not require a continent to be land. It is all to do with the nature of the crust: it must be continental crust. Whether it is above or below sea-level is not deemed relevant.
What is continental crust?
In the 1960s, scientists involved in exploration of the ocean floors established that the Earth’s crust beneath the oceans is fundamentally different from that of the major land areas. Two types of crust were recognised: oceanic crust and continental crust.
Oceanic crust is dominated by basalt, whereas continental crust is dominated by granite.
These are the most common rock-types on Earth and they are both igneous, that is, they start off as hot liquids. When they cool, they crystallise and form rock. Curiously, granite is less dense (2.5-2.7 gm/cc) than basalt (2.8-3.0 gm/cc) and in a sense floats with respect to basalt.
This explains why oceanic crust is low with respect to the Earth’s surface, and why continental crust rides high. It is quite literally all about buoyancy. The average height of oceanic crust is 4,500 metres below sea level, whereas the average height of continental crust is 450 metres above sea level.
And the reason why we did not figure this out until the 1960s is that oceanic crust, representing 71% of the Earth’s crustal surface, is buried by seawater and hidden from sight.
The extent of Zealandia
Sir James Hector, the founder of Te Papa, was one of the first to conclude that New Zealand is surrounded by an extensive continental shelf with water depths of 1,000 to 2,000 metres, much shallower than the deep ocean floor at 4,000 to 5,000 metres. This was based on soundings that he made from the New Zealand Government steamship Hinemoa and he reported his findings in 1895. If only he had gravity measurements to make sense of it all!
Gravity varies at the Earth’s surface as a function of density of materials in and on the Earth’s crust. Using satellites, gravity studies have enabled superb mapping of seafloor topography.
But wait…there is more! Because of the strong density contrast between basalt and granite, gravity studies also reveal the extent of oceanic crust and continental crust.
Following established scientific convention, the boundary around Zealandia is drawn along the 2,500 metre isobath. This submarine contour may be thought of as a proxy for the natural boundary between oceanic and continental crust.
The last word
To be a continent, a tract of continental crust that exceeds three million square kilometres must also be entirely surrounded by oceanic crust. This will ensure that it is indeed a discrete entity.
As luck would have it, there is a sliver of oceanic crust in the Cato Trough off the coast of Queensland. At just 25 kilometres wide, this is all that separates Zealandia from Australia. Yet this makes ALL the difference!
It can legitimately be claimed that Zealandia is a distinct continent.
What makes Zealandia special is that its continental crust is only 20-30 kilometres thick. This is unusually thin by comparison with all other continents. It is all about buoyancy. The thicker the continental crust, the higher it will be and the thinner it is, the lower it will be. This explains why 94% of Zealandia is submarine.
Great article! I have Facebook’ed it for our guests (and former guests) as well as our friends & family.
If “To be a continent, a tract of continental crust … must be entirely surrounded by oceanic crust”, does this mean there are only 5 continents – Australia, Zealandia, Antarctica,The Americas (as North and South are contiguous) and AfroEurasia (as Africa, Asia and Europe also are not separated by oceanic crust)?
Thank you for this very clear and easily understood explanation of Zealandia and why it is a mostly submerged continent.