Tag Archives: taxonomy

A new fern, Lastreopsis kermadecensis

Te Papa Research Fellow Patrick Brownsey and I have just described a new species of fern, Lastreopsis kermadecensis.  It only occurs on Raoul Island, which is the largest island in the Kermadec Islands group.  Hence, the second part of the new species name!

The newly described Lastreopsis kermadecensis, from Raoul Island in the Kermadecs. Photo by and courtesy of Peter de Lange.

The Kermadec Islands are the most northern part of the New Zealand Botanical Region.  Raoul Island is about 980 km north-east of the North Island.  Much of the indigenous flora is similar to mainland New Zealand.  But there are a number of plants that occur on the Kermadec Islands and elsewhere in the tropical south Pacific but not in mainland New Zealand.  There are also about 25 vascular plant species that are only found on the Kermadec Islands, like this new fern.

Wikipedia’s entry on the Kermadec Islands.

Some of the specimens from the Kermadec Islands amongst Te Papa’s collections.

While the official description of Lastreopsis kermadecensis is only recent, it has actually been suspected for nearly 50 years that the Lastreopsis on Raoul Island was a distinct species.  But it wasn’t until now that someone (us) did the work to test whether this was indeed the case.  This involved comparing specimens from Raoul Island, New Zealand, Australia, and elsewhere in the Pacific.  The work was completely collections-based; neither Pat nor I have been to the Kermadec Islands! Instead, we used specimens from the collections of Te Papa, Auckland Museum, Landcare Research, the Royal Botanic Gardens Sydney, the Queensland Herbarium, and Hawaii’s Bishop Museum. 

Abstract of the paper describing Lastreopsis kermadecensis.

Lastreopsis kermadecensis looks similar to New Zealand’s smooth shield fern, Lastreopsis glabella.  Lastreopsis glabella is a common forest fern.  You will have undoubtedly seen it if you’ve spent any time in New Zealand’s forests, even if you didn’t recognise it.  One of the differences between Lastreopsis kermadecensis and Lastreopsis glabella is that the latter has an abundance of small, orange glands on the undersides of its fronds.  Lastreopsis kermadecensis is actually most similar to Lastreopsis smithiana from eastern Australia, but there are several differences which we felt were sufficient to treat them as distinct species.

Pictures of New Zealand Lastreopsis from Te Papa’s Collections Online.

The formal description of Lastreopsis kermadecensis means we now recognise 196 ferns and lycophytes indigenous to New Zealand.  We are aware of several additional undescribed or unrecognised species, so a few more years of work will see the list top 200.

Te Papa’s list of New Zealand ferns and lycophytes.

Incidentally, Lastreopsis kermadecensis is one of the first New Zealand plants to be described under the changed rules that allow electronic publication of new scientific names.

Abstract of the article setting out the changes that allow electronic publication of new scientific names for plants, algae, and fungi.

Collections Online update: Taxonomy browser

Since we released the new version of Collections Online  in July last year we’ve made the odd fix, or a new feature here and there. You probably don’t notice them but hopefully they’ve made your browsing experience a bit easier.  However recently we’ve done a couple of things we thought were worth pointing out. First up, one for those interested in the natural environment collections.    

Aptenodytes forsteri

Aptenodytes forsteri

 

Taxonomy Browser
Initially this may look like just one for the scientists out there, but I think it could help enthusiasts, and pretty much anybody else, get a bit more insight into the relationships between species of birds, plants and our other natural environment collections. A new taxonomy browser allows you to browse up and down the scientific classifications of our collection specimens.   

For example if you check out the specimen record  for this fine fellow (Emperor Penguin) at the right of the page you can see the new Related Taxa section, showing the classification hierarchy. In this new section click on Aptenodytes forsteri (Species) you jump into the species level record. This shows you the other specimens we have for that species. You can then browse up browse up to the broader level (Genus, Aptenodytes) where you can see all the species (and our specimens) that belong to that genus, or you can browse broader again up to the family record Spheniscidae (penguins), and so on. This also applies to our plant (try it with the ferns) and zoological collections, including the ever-popular spiders.   

Obviously it’s much easier to move around if you understand the latin names used in the Linnaean structure, but hopefully being able to browse around is at least a start for the non-scientists among us too.    

The next step is being able to browse humanities objects for a particular species using the correct taxonomic identification, allowing to see not  only our specimens, but objects in our art photography, Taonga Maori, Pacific or History collections that feature that species.   

Getting a measure of plant taxonomy

As a plant taxonomist, most of my work involves determining how many species are in a particular genus of flowering plants, how they are related to one another, and what the correct scientific names for those species are. To do this, I gather and analyze data from a number of sources, including genetics, chromosomes, ecology, geography, and morphology. 

My colleague Leon Perrie has blogged previously about generating genetic data, including extracting DNA and analyzing microsatellite markers for Pseudopanax species, and detecting differences in DNA sequence data for maidenhair fern species.  

Here I will show how I go about collecting morphological data from herbarium specimens for taxonomic research. 

Heidi observing a Te Papa herbarium specimen of Plantago spathulata with a dissecting microscope. Photo © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Heidi observing a Te Papa herbarium specimen of Plantago spathulata with a dissecting microscope. Photo by Carlos Lehnebach © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

The first step of deciding which characters or traits to measure and observe is key. This will vary depending on the particular plant group being studied, and can be an involved process (meaning, probably the subject of another blog!). Some examples of characters commonly used are leaf length and width, presence and type of hairs on calyx, and number of seeds per capsule. 

The next step is to measure the characters on herbarium specimens collected from throughout the geographic range of the species of interest. Because many of the traits are quite small, a 10x hand lens or (even better) a dissecting microscope is necessary to see them. 

Rulers or microscope reticles can be used for measuring, but I prefer a digital calipers. Digital calipers are very precise and can be connected to a computer so that the data is transferred directly to a spreadsheet by just pressing a button! 

Here you can see the whole set up, including Heidi measuring the specimen with the digital calipers, that are in turn connected to the laptop for instant data transfer. Photo © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Here you can see Heidi measuring a specimen using the whole set up: dissecting microscope and digital calipers that are plugged into a laptop for instant data transfer. Photo by Carlos Lehnebach © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Measuring leaf width (in mm) of a Te Papa specimen of Plantago spathulata with a digital calipers. Photo © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Measuring leaf width (in mm) of a Te Papa specimen of Plantago spathulata with a digital calipers. Photo by Carlos Lehnebach © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Laptop with spreadsheet showing highlighted cell with "13.28" mm leaf width measurement, that has been automatically transferred from the digital calipers to the morphological data matrix. Photo © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Laptop with spreadsheet showing highlighted cell with "13.28" mm leaf width measurement, that has been automatically transferred from the digital calipers to the morphological data matrix. Photo by Heidi Meudt © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Collecting morphological data for one plant specimen, that is, measuring and observing specific traits from the roots, leaves, flowers, and fruits, can take anywhere from 30 to 90 minutes. Multiply that by dozens or even hundreds of specimens, and you can see that collecting morphological data for taxonomic research takes time. 

Once the data matrix has been generated comes the exciting part: analysis and interpretation of the results. But I’ll leave that for another blog entry! 

Calipers and laptop with data matrix of morphological characters. Photo © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

Calipers and laptop with data matrix of morphological characters. Photo by Heidi Meudt © Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

About hooks, hairy legs and sedges!!

Tramping in New Zealand forests can be an enjoyable and very relaxing activity. However, if your legs are hairy, it could be a painful and very annoying experience. Camouflaged among ferns and ground orchids, hook grasses are waiting, ready to clasp to the hairs or clothing of any unwary tramper.

Hook grasses get their name from a hook-like structure which arises from the base of the ovary of each female flower.

hook&stigma

Detail of a receptive female flower of Uncinia zotovii indicating hook and stigmas. Photo by C.A. Lehnebach (c) Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

 

This structure allows dispersal of the achene, a single seed produced by each female flower, to other sites by clasping to the hairs, or feathers, of any animal (or hairy tramper) passing by.

achene

Seed (achene) of a native hook sedge. Photo by C.A. Lehnebach (c) Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

 

Flowers in Uncinia are unisexual, that is male and female reproductive structures are on separate flowers. In Uncinia, female flowers are at the base of the spike while male flowers are at the top.

spike-details-blog

Mature spike of Uncinia caespitosa indicating female and male sections. Photo by C.A. Lehnebach (c) Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

 

Only female flowers have a hook. Male flowers are small and have three stamens, which quickly fall off after the pollen is released.

anther&filament

Male flowers of Uncinia and detail of stamens. Photo by C.A. Lehnebach (c) Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa.

 

New Zealand is the diversity hotspot for Uncinia, however, little is known about their ecology and the actual number of species is still uncertain. Some species are so variable that it is possible they may consist of two or more species.

As part of my work in Te Papa I have investigated a group of morphologically variable Uncinia. The main goals of my study were to understand the cause(s) of this variability and to produce revised descriptions for these species to make their identification easier.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 279 other followers