Category Archives: Conservation

Conservation of Poedua, part 2

Poedua is an oil painting on stretched canvas, meaning the composition is painted on a fabric support which is stretched to keep it evenly tensioned, over an expandable wooden stretcher.  Canvas supports began to replace traditional wooden panel supports from about the 16th century and were the most commonly used type of support by the 18th century. 

The back of the canvas

In this photo you can see the back of the canvas support and the wooden stretcher frame which keeps the canvas taut, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227733 © Te Papa

The canvas used for this painting is probably linen (untested) and it has a twill weave, which creates a distinct texture which is visible through some areas of the paint layer.  Linen is a common support for paintings of this age, but other fabrics are also used as supports for paintings, including hemp and cotton.  The canvas is attached with small metal tacks around the sides of the stretcher bars.  We think there’s a good chance that this is probably the original attachment because there are no old holes in either the canvas or the stretcher, which can indicate that the canvas has been taken off in the past.

Here you can see a profile view of the painting showing a metal tack attaching the canvas to the stretcher, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227731 © Te Papa

The back of the canvas is no longer looking as it would have when Webber first painted it!  The canvas is made of a natural fibre which has darkened and discoloured because of the process of ageing and deterioration.  We have found the canvas to be in quite a good condition, given its age.  There are a few areas we will need to address in our treatment, including some small tears and embrittlement around the edges.  This has occurred because over time the fibres have become inelastic and snap rather than stretch.  There are some areas of damage which we can’t determine the extent of just yet because they have been covered with patches on the back.

Patch

Detail of one of the old patches on the back of the canvas. At this stage we are unsure what the patch is covering, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227733 © Te Papa

The back of the canvas is also dirty from being exposed to the world for the past 226 years!  There is a layer of dirt and some staining present, which are a combination of age-soiling and various deposits and residues.  We hope to be able to reduce some of this soiling with cleaning, but this action probably won’t dramatically change the way the canvas currently appears.  What we hope to achieve is a reduction of the dirt matter, which if left, can accelerate deterioration.

An interesting discovery for us is that Poedua has never been lined.  Lining is the attachment of a new support to the entire reverse of a painting on canvas.  Its aim is to give additional support and reinforcement to a weakened or damaged canvas.  It was a very common restoration procedure in the past and most paintings of this age have been lined at some point.  The fact that the canvas has remained unlined means that we can see the back of the original canvas and a lovely inscription, presumably by the artist himself. 

Poedua inscription

Detail of the handwritten inscription on the back of the canvas. The inscription includes information such as the subject's name, her father’s name and the location of their village. Some of the inscription is unclear and we are hopeful that cleaning will reveal it more, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227733 © Te Papa

 
 

The conservation of Poedua – part 1

Poedua (Poetua), daughter of Oreo, chief of Ulaietea, one of the Society Isles, 1785, Webber, John (1750–1793). Purchased 2010. Te Papa

Poedua (Poetua), daughter of Oreo, chief of Ulaietea, one of the Society Isles, 1785, Webber, John (1750–1793). Purchased 2010. Te Papa

Welcome to the first blog to keep you up-to-date with the conservation treatment of John Webber’s portrait of Poedua.  Katherine Campbell and I, the two paintings conservators here at Te Papa, will aim to post fortnightly on the progress of our work, offering you insight into what happens to a painting during a conservation treatment.

The painting arrived in the paintings conservation lab shortly after being taken down from display in Toi Te Papa.  Our first task was to remove the painting from the frame and to remove the temporary backing board which had been attached to the reverse of the painting for the transit from London to Wellington.  This is done in order to gain unimpeded access to the whole work, from the front and back of the canvas.

Katherine examining the painting with a hand-held microscope, 2011, Photograph by Melanie Carlisle. © Te Papa

One of the most important aspects of a conservator’s job is documentation; we need to clearly record the current state of the artwork or object.  For a painting, this documentation is generally broken down for each of the paintings ‘layers’.  We begin at the auxiliary support (in this case the wooden stretcher), the primary support (the twill canvas), the ground layer (or priming, preparatory layer), the paint layer and the surface coating.

This report includes a detailed description of the layers, covering visual appearance and the artist’s technique; we also consider what materials were available to the artist and often reference colourmen’s catalogues from the time and place the painting was executed.  We also document the current condition of each layer, with possible reasons behind that condition and any ongoing issues of deterioration.   

It is this documentation that we have been working on for the past few weeks which will help inform us about what treatments to undertake.  We use a variety of different technical examination techniques to aid us in finding out as much as possible about the painting. 

Some of these techniques include examining the painting with different forms of illumination; using normal lighting sources, we look at the painting in reflected, raking and transmitted light.  We use UV lamps in a dark room to investigate the surface coating and any later additions by a previous restorer.  We use infrared photography to see through the paint layer and identify (if they are present) preparatory drawings as well as artists changes (pentimenti), damages and associated restorations.  We examine the individual brushstrokes using a stereo-microscope and get to know all the fine details in the painting.  We use these photographic images to help illustrate and complement the written condition report.

Infrared photograph - detail, 2011, Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I227737. © Te Papa. The small red circle at the bottom shows the changes the artist made to the scale of Poedua's little finger (pentimenti). The larger red oval shows an area where the paint layer has been damaged and covered with a previous restorers overpaint.

 

Ultra-violet photograph of Poedua, 2011, Photograph by Melanie Carlisle © Te Papa - This image shows the auto-fluorescence of the natural resin of the varnish when exposed to ultra-violet light. The brushstrokes from the varnish application can be seen. The variation in the auto-fluorescence indicates the uneveness of the varnish layer.

Once this stage of the documentation is complete, we write a treatment proposal to outline what we hope to achieve with our conservation treatment.  The technical examination continues throughout the conservation process, we continue to learn more about the painting and the artist as we spend more time with the painting.

2011 Māori and Pacific Textile Symposium

Māori & Pacific textile symposium banner

2011 Māori and Pacific Textile Symposium

The beating of aute, or tapa, is a heartbeat that resounds across the ocean of Kiwa. The harakeke of Aotearoa, symbolising family, acknowledges the relationship of the Pacific people as one, through weaving. These genealogical and material connections will be explored at the inaugural 2011 Māori and Pacific Textile Symposium, hosted by Te Papa.

Whatu Raranga a Kiwa, Understanding and Uniting Māori and Pacific Textiles
Friday 10 and Saturday 11 June 2011, Te Papa

You are invited to submit abstracts of no more than 300 words on the theme of ‘Whatu Raranga a Kiwa, Understanding and Uniting Māori and Pacific Textiles’. We look forward to receiving thought-provoking and inspirational papers that will encourage discussion and unite people’s passion for textiles.

For more information see the website: http://www.tepapa.govt.nz/WhatsOn/allevents/Pages/MaoriandPacificTextileSymposium.aspx

Out with the old … Conservation changes in Enriching Fashion

Yesterday seven items were taken out of the cases in Te Papa’s exhibition: Enriching Fashion: an eye for detail on level 4.

In the photograph below a jaunty two-piece playsuit from the 1960s is removed from a case and replaced with a one-piece bathing suit that is almost a hundred years old.

Bathing suit changeover, 10 March 2011, by Te Papa staff. Photograph by Kirstie Ross

For some reason the frill around the waist of the pair of togs now on display (below) can be removed – a very curious feature.

Edwardian bathing suit ready to go on display in Enriching Fashion. Photograph by Kirstie Ross

These replacements are necessary because some of the garments and accessories have been on display and exposed to light for their allotted time.

Textiles are light sensitive so Te Papa’s textile conservators recommend that they are displayed for limited time periods. This precaution means that garments have the best chance of being preserved for the future.

Waistcoat, circa 1780, Maker unknown, France. Bequest of Mrs Alec Tweedie, 1946. Te Papa

Waistcoat, circa 1780, Maker unknown, France. Bequest of Mrs Alec Tweedie, 1946. Te Papa

This richly embroidered man’s waistcoat (above), which is 230 years old, has been replaced by an even older embroidered child’s bodice. It will be on display in Enriching Fashion on on level 4 until June.

Another replacement item is a beautiful lilac wedding dress (below left) that was made in Italy in 1909, which has taken the place of a delicately ruffled day dress made for a London department store about 1900.

1909 Wedding dress (left) replaces 1900s day dress (right) in the Eyelight gallery. Photograph by Kirstie Ross
For more garments and accessories see Enriching Fashion: an eye for detail.

Phar Lap’s Trip to Melbourne – A Conservation Perspective

 

Phar Lap on display at Te Papa

Phar Lap while on display at Te Papa (c)Kate Whitley 2010

As many of you know, Phar Lap is on his way back to Melbourne for the 150th anniversary of the Melbourne Cup to take place later this year.

Phar Lap was foaled on 4 October 1926 in Seadown, near Timaru on the South Island of New Zealand. Bought by David J. Davis and trained by Harry Telford, a Sydney trainer, Phar Lap was ultimately trained to race in Australia. He died while in America on 5 April 1932.

Upon his death, Phar Lap’s remains were divided up between Canberra, Melbourne and New Zealand and his skeletal remains have lived on display at Te Papa since they were articulated in 1938 by Charles Lindsay and E.H. Gibson.

Newspaper Article

Newspaper article published in August of 1938 regarding the original articulation of Phar Lap's skeleton

On 30 July 2010 he was disassembled by Conservator, Robert Clendon, and Collection Manager Gillian Stone, who will also courier the skeleton to Melbourne in September 2010. As a visiting intern working with Robert, I was given the opportunity to help in his dismantling, condition assessment and treatment prior to being sent to Melbourne.

Dissassembly 1

Removal of the skull was the first step in the dissassembly of the skeleton (c)Kate Whitley 2010

Dissassembly 2

Intern Cindy Lee Scott assists Te Papa Conservator, Robert Clendon in removing the right front leg (c)Kate Whitley 2010

Removal from Case

The whole team works to remove the torso from the display case safely (c)Kate Whitley 2010

The conservation of Phar Lap’s skeleton did not begin in July of this year, however. Prior to the disassembly of the skeleton, some remedial work to the slumping framework supporting Phar Lap’s head and neck was conducted in his case by Robert Clendon; this was done in order to that he would “look ‘proud’ again” (Jane Keig, Media Release 2010).

In preparation for the take-down of the skeleton, there were several meetings first to discuss all of the steps necessary, not only for taking the skeleton apart, but also for how he will be crated and shipped to ensure that the skeleton arrives safely in Melbourne and returns safely to us at Te Papa in March of 2011.

The disassembly started at 7.30 in the morning on Monday, July 30th so that we would have time to get him off of display before the museum opened to the public. Under the watchful eyes of the media we took the skeleton apart into its larger pieces: first the head, than the seven cervical vertebrae, then the hind legs (to ensure that the weight distribution remained as even as possible on the remaining torso), the front legs, and finally, the torso was lifted up from its two support posts and placed onto a bed of beanbag pillows in his crate and the lot were transported up to the conservation laboratories at the Tory Street facilities.

Torso (c)Te Papa 2010

Placing the torso carefully into its crate for transport to the conservation laboratories

Transporting

Transporting the crates to the docking bay for transport to Tory Street conservation laboratories (c)Kate Whitley 2010

Conservation Lab

Unpacking the vertebrae in the conservation laboratory (c)Kate Whitley 2010

Once in the conservation lab, the long process of assessing the condition and cataloguing any damage began. This was done by myself and fellow conservation intern Elizabeth Stephens who is studying conservation at the University of Lincoln in the UK. Together we catalogued and measured every one of the 205 bones in Phar Lap’s skeleton and quite the task it was! It took us over a week!

Condition Assessment

Elizabeth Stephens works on the condition assessment of Phar Lap's vertebrae (c)Cindy Lee Scott 2010

After the condition assessment it was time for some minor conservation treatment. This consisted of the consolidation of fragile portions of the sternum and ribcage with a conservation grade acrylic adhesive, the over-painting of newly created fills, and the over-painting of spots of dark blue-black paint on the hooves, which had been applied during an earlier, though undocumented, conservation treatment.

After treatment, it was time to get Phar Lap all safely crated for shipping! The crates were made by crate-maker extraordinaire Pierre Lagace, and as you can see, they are an art form in and of themselves!

Crates

One of the many crates used to safely transport Phar Lap to Melbourne (c)Kate Whitley 2010

The Melbourne Museum exhibition will open to the public on 16 September and we hope to have photos and another blog up soon after that!

A ‘Slice’ of Conservation Heaven

Hello all!  Welcome to my first post here on the Te Papa Blog.  My name is Cindy Lee and I’m an intern working in the Object’s Conservation Lab at the Tory Street Conservation Laboratories.  This internship is a part of my degree requirements for  my Masters Degree in Archaeological and Ethnographic Conservation at the University of California, Los Angeles, and the J. Paul Getty Museum. 

Prior to starting my career as a conservator, however, I was a field archaeologist working throughout the Mediterranean, but primarily in Greece.  As such, much of my experience as a conservator has focused on work in the field and on archaeological objects.  My time here at Te Papa is an exciting opportunity to branch out into all sorts of materials – an experience that I’m thrilled to be able to share here with you.

First up then – I am currently working on objects from the upcoming ‘Slice of Heaven; Twentieth Century Aotearoa’ exhibit , which is set to open on October 2nd, 2010 – so save that date! 

Here I am learning exactly what the role of the conservator is in the preparation of a large exhibit – and there is much to do!  Among a flurry of condition assessment reports that are used by curators and collection managers to decide what objects are stable enough for display, there are also treatment reports, and of course, the treatments themselves.  The conservators also play a role in the decision making processes regarding the  display cases and mounts themselves, as we are working closely with mount makers and crate makers to ensure that the objects are not damaged either in transport or while on display – keeping both the objects, and the public, safe.

Some of the objects that I’ve worked on for this exhibit include assessing the condition of a 1960s Vasectomy Tool Kit, graciously on loan to us by Dr. D. Urquhart-Hay – which included a scalpel handle, forceps, artery clamps and, the most terrifying in appearance…the towel clamps! – no, really, they had the most terrifying little pincers on the ends!

I was also given the opportunity to treat a model of the New Zealand Railways K900 class steam locomotive and tender.  This was especially great for me, since I had just travelled from Auckland to Wellington on the Overlander, and our train was pulled from Taihape to Feilding by an actual K900 steam locomotive.

New Zealand Railways K900 class steam locomotive and tender model DT

Model of the New Zealand Railways K900 class steam locomotive and tender during its conservation treatment in preparation for the 'Slice of Heaven' exhibit. (c) Te Papa 2010

New Zealand Railways K900  on the Overlander

Picture of the actual K900 Steam Engine attached to the Overlander at Taihape on July 3rd, 2010. (c) Cindy Lee Scott 2010

One object that I am currently working on is a 1940s wicker baby pram.  This type of object is particularly challenging and interesting for a conservator because it contains so many different materials; in this case we’re looking at wood, metal, leatherette, textile, rubber, and wicker.  The challenge is that each of these materials have different conservation needs.   It’s also a challenge to document the condition, since we have to be clear enough in our descriptive terminology that another person who has never seen the object can clearly understand which part of the object I am talking about.

1940s Baby Pram (c) Te Papa

Cleaning the metal components of a baby pram in preparation for the 'Slice of Heaven' exhibit

Sometimes the easiest way to do this is to approach an object as the sum of its parts; for instance, with the pram, I assessed and treated first the wheels, than the steel undercarriage and suspension, then the wicker components and finally, the lining.

Treatment of this object was kept to a minimum – it was only cleaned to remove the accumulated dust and dirt from years on display and in storage.  The key here, was to be able to distinguish between ‘dirt’ that occurred during the usage of the object, and was, as such, a part of its history, and ‘dirt’ that is not, and therefore should be removed – not always an easy task!

Baby Pram interior -Before Treatment

Before treatment photograph of the interior of the baby pram showing the soiling from years in storage. (c) Te Papa 2010

GH012069-Overall-interior-After Treatment

View of the interior of the baby pram after cleaning the lining, fixing the loose tacks and cleaning and re-attaching the pompom fringe on the bonnet. (c) Te Papa 2010

In addition to working on materials for exhibit, I’ve also done some minor treatment on objects that we are sending out on loan to other museums, both here in NZ and abroad.  Some of the more interesting pieces?  A couple of rats, a lamb and a locust!

Object LM000308 During Treatment

Cleaning the wool of a taxidermied lamb in preparation for loan using a dental vacuum and some screening to prevent damage. (c) Te Papa 2010

LM1375-Overall-Before Treatment

Conservation condition photograph of a Rattus rattus, in preparation for a loan. (c) Te Papa 2010

All of this, of course, is being done  under the watchful eyes of Objects Conservator, Robert Clendon, of course.

Stay tuned for my next entry – The Conservation of Phar Lap!

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 272 other followers