Author Archives:

Behind the Scenes of Angels and Aristocrats

Te Papa’s latest art exhibition, Angels & Aristocrats, opens on the 20th October in the Level 5 galleries.  The exhibition draws on a number of collections from around New Zealand including artworks from Te Papa’s collection which you will see on display.  Some of these paintings required attention in the conservation lab before the exhibition began, to allow them to be fully appreciated on display.  As paintings age they begin to deteriorate and changes occur in their appearance and condition.  Both deterioration and change are a result of the interaction of all the materials which make up a painting and the environment around them.  Therefore, as conservators we sometimes have to intervene and carry out treatment to repair and stabilise the art work.

Image

Mrs Humphrey Devereux; 1771; Copley, John Singleton. Ultra-violet examination of the painting during cleaning. The varnish fluoresces a bright blue colour which indicates a synthetic varnish layer. The painting is partially cleaned at this point hence the patchy nature of the fluorescence. You can also clearly see the test cleaning spots and two areas of damage which appear as white marks in the image, 2012, Photograph by Katherine Campbell. © Te Papa

Conservation procedures aimed at preventing or slowing deterioration include repair of tears, correction of canvas distortions and consolidation of flaking paint.  Restorations may also be performed when the aesthetic appearance of the painting and the intention of the artist have been compromised, and can include the removal of discoloured surface coatings and the filling and retouching of loss.

Image

The rectangular shape on the subject’s face is a cleaning test which reveals the original colour of the composition beneath, 2012, Photograph by Katherine Campbell. © Te Papa

 

One of the paintings that underwent conservation before the exhibition was Mrs Humphrey Devereux painted by John Singleton Copley in 1771.  The varnish layer on this portrait, applied in the 1960’s during a previous conservation treatment, had diminished the tonal ranges of the work as it became very degraded and matte over time, therefore requiring removal.  The varnish removed from the portrait was very dark yellow and quite thick and it took several weeks to complete the removal using a solvent mixture arrived at through a testing regime to ensure its effectiveness without any damage to the underlying paint. 

Image

Before varnish removal, 2012, Photograph by Katherine Campbell. © Te Papa

Image

Removal of the old varnish had a dramatic effect on the overall colour, balance and depth of the painting, 2012, Photograph by Katherine Campbell. © Te Papa

 

The painting was re-varnished with a clear, synthetic resin to emulate the original surface.  The varnish selected is one that has been developed specifically for the conservation profession and is known to be stable and reversible which ensures that any future cleaning will not need to be repeated for a long time and if it does eventually become necessary, it can be done with the least possible intervention. The final part of the treatment was to carry out inpainting or retouching over the areas of old damage and then a final layer of varnish was sprayed onto the painting before it was refitted into its frame.

Mrs Humphrey Devereux; 1771; Copley, John Singleton. After treatment, 2012, photograph by Kate Whitley © Te Papa

The Conservation of Poedua – Part 11

The varnish removal of Poedua is progressing slowly and painstakingly and we are now almost halfway through this important part of the treatment.  As we have mentioned before, removal of discoloured varnish can have a dramatic effect on the overall balance, colour and depth of a painting.  Because discoloured varnishes like Poedua’s are usually a yellow-brown colour, they tend to reinforce warm tones but counteract the cooler colours such as some greens, whites and cooler blues.

Flowers before cleaning

This image shows Poedua's face and the flowers pre treatment - before surface cleaning and varnish removal. Photograph taken by Michael Hall, 2011 © Te Papa

Every week we are recovering more of the artist’s original paint from beneath the discoloured varnish and overpaints and we have made some nice discoveries.  Most recently, we have revealed the beautiful colours and brush-stroke detail of the flowers in Poedua’s hair. 

Poedua flower after cleaning

In this image after cleaning, you can now see much more detail in the brush-work of the artist and appreciate all the colours of his palette. Photograph by Katherine Campbell, 2011 © Te Papa

Before we cleaned them, the flowers were quite dark and a little cloudy, making them a bit difficult  to interpret.  Now that the surface dirt and varnish has been removed you can see the lovely detail of the brush-work and full range of colours employed by Webber.

Poedua's flower after cleaning

This image shows the difference in appearance after cleaning of Poedua's hair, face and the flower. Photograph by Katherine Campbell, 2011 © Te Papa

The Conservation of Poedua – part 9

Hello Poedua followers!  Mel and I have taken a break from our treatment of Poedua for a while in order to focus on some other paintings conservation commitments.
 
In the past two months we have been kept busy working on a loan of 23 paintings for the exhibition Painting New Zealand which is currently on display at Tauranga Art Gallery. 
 

We have prepared a number of paintings that have been on display in the Te Papa touring exhibition E Tu Ake, which will soon be making its international debut at the Quai Branly in Paris.

Lastly, but by no means least, we have also been very busy working on the upcoming Oceania exhibition which will be opening soon at Te Papa and City Gallery Wellington.  The Tony Fomison painting below is one of the many art works that will be on display in the Oceania exhibition which is on during the Rugby World Cup.

Te Puhi o te tai Haruru, 1984-85, Fomison, Tony (1939–1990), Auckland. Purchased 2003. Te Papa

Te Puhi o te tai Haruru, 1984-85, Fomison, Tony (1939–1990), Auckland. Purchased 2003. Te Papa

If you are missing your fortnightly Poedua updates, here are a couple of other conservation blogs that you may find of interest from some overseas colleagues. The first is written by Hannah Tempest who interned with us last year and is currently undertaking an internship at the National Gallery of Denmark in Copenhagen. The second is written by conservators at the National Gallery of Victoria in Melbourne and follows the conservation of a Nicolas Poussin painting.

The conservation of Poedua: part 6

Now that the painting has had its layer of surface dirt removed, the next step in the treatment is the removal of the varnish layer.  A lot of the principles that we talked about with surface cleaning, also apply to the removal of varnish layers.  Therefore, prior to beginning it’s important to establish as closely as possible what the varnish or coating is, consider whether it is appropriate to remove it and work out a strategy for removing it safely.
 

In the case of Poedua, we want to remove the varnish layer because it is very discoloured and has been applied extremely unevenly, which has become more apparent as the discolouration has progressed.  Similar to the effects of surface dirt, the discoloured varnish present has diminished the tonal ranges of the painting.  

 
Uneven varnish under UV

Under UV the uneven application of the varnish becomes really obvious. The bright green fluorescence indicates a natural resin varnish, 2011. Photograph by Mel Carlisle © Te Papa.

The first step is to characterise the varnish and work out how many layers are present.  There are several techniques available to us including, exposing the painting to ultraviolet light and taking cross-sections of the paint and varnish layers.  Looking at the painting under UV lamps causes specific auto-fluorescence in different materials which helps us with identification.  The varnish layer on Poedua fluoresced a bright green colour, indicating a natural resin such as dammar or mastic.  This wasn’t surprising to us since both are common varnishes that we might expect to find on a work such as this. 

Cross-section analysis involves the sampling of a microscopic piece of the painting, usually taken from an area of existing damage.  This sample is set in a polyester resin and ground down with fine sand paper.  The cross-section is then examined using a compound microscope where we can see the building up of paint layers by the artist, surface coatings and later additions.  From the cross-section we took from Poedua we can see that there is only one varnish layer apparent.

Viewing the cross-section under magnification

Once the cross-section has been prepared, we look at it under magnification and also UV to see the build-up of layers used by the artist, 2011. Photograph by Katherine Campbell © Te Papa.

 

Cross-section under UV and magnification

This a cross-section taken from a Don Driver painting in Te Papa's collection. 1980-0013-1; Zither; Don Driver. Under magnification and UV it's possible to see several layers of paint and 2 layers that fluoresce with the appearance of varnish. The cross-section was photographed by Sarah Hillary at the Auckland Art Gallery, 2010 © Te Papa.

Varnish layers become increasingly difficult to remove the older they are.  This is due to alterations in their chemical structure that occur over time.  The solvents that conservators use to remove varnishes are carefully tested in a similar manner to the surface cleaning testing.  We use a variety of solvent mixtures and different preparations and combinations including enzymes, soaps and gels.  Their effectiveness builds further on our knowledge about the varnish layer we are dealing with.  Solvents work by penetrating the varnish layer and swelling the film, bringing the resin into solution and allowing it to be removed from the surface.  After initial testing, we select the most appropriate solvent or solvent mixture and test this in the various areas of the composition.   Constant care and attention is crucial during this process because the varnish layer is usually the last layer before the paint film is encountered.

Testing the varnish solubility

Initial testing is done under magnification so we can closely monitor the results. As with the procedure for surface cleaning swabs are kept along with notes of the results for comparison, 2011. Photograph by Mel Carlisle © Te Papa.

 

Varnish removal tests

Once the pale paints have been tested we move onto all the major areas of colour. The two circular areas that appear dry and matt are the patches where the varnish has been removed and the paint layer is exposed. At the end of the treatment a new varnish layer will be applied which will resaturate and intensify the paint surface again, 2011. Photograph by Katherine Campbell © Te Papa.

The Conservation of Poedua: Part 4

Now that we have cleaned the back of the canvas we can look at surface cleaning the front of the painting.  This is a separate procedure from the removal of varnish and overpaints and is completed first because surface dirt is the first layer encountered.  The reason we remove the dirt layer on paintings is because it considerably alters the colour and tone of original paint, can obscure image detail and significantly alter the surface gloss, clarity and hue of surface coatings.

Surface Cleaning

Detail; 1992-0035-1883; Lake Manapouri; Baker, William George; During treatment. The cleaned rectangular area at the left shows you what a difference surface cleaning makes to the appearance of a painting, 2006. Photograph by Katherine Campbell © Te Papa

Surface dirt is a mixture of all sorts of quite unpleasant things including flakes of skin and hair, smoke from household fires and tar from cigarettes, food and drink deposits, moulds and fungi, insect debris and general atmospheric pollutants!  To remove the surface dirt, it is necessary to overcome the bonds that are holding the dirt to the painting without disrupting the underlying paint layer.  To find the safest cleaning formulation we carry out a process of testing different mixtures through careful application and monitoring of the results.
Testing notes

As we go through the testing process to find the best cleaning formulation, we keep a detailed written record of what we used and how well it worked, 2011. Photograph by Katherine Campbell. © Te Papa

When we carry out our testing, we apply the cleaning solutions with small cotton swabs in a rolling motion over the paint surface.  We test inconspicuous areas first, starting with light colours and then progress to all the main paint colours.  We keep and label the test swabs for comparison.  We often have to reassess our cleaning strategy because the solubility of dirt and paint can change across the surface of the painting requiring the use of different materials and concentrations of solutions. The most common surface cleaning agents are aqueous in nature – meaning they are water-based.  We can modify and control the properties of the water by adding pH buffers and ionic buffers and by adding chelating agents, surfactants, enzymes and gelling agents.

Mel mixing

Mel carefully makes up a testing solution to trial on the painting, 2011. Photograph by Katherine Campbell. © Te Papa

Last year I was able to attend a course in Melbourne about the cleaning of paintings using the Modular Cleaning Program.  This is a database system and an approach for cleaning paintings that has been developed to help conservators use established theory and materials in a way which makes the complicated chemistry of cleaning more accessible.  Basically, the computer program is better at working with piles of numbers than us!  It saves us time by working out the complicated stuff, like ionic equilibria, which requires pages of calculations and is really boring and not to mention, tough!

MCP

With the help of the modular cleaning program, we are able to make up and test a wider range of formulations than we would ordinarily have time to do, 2011. Photograph by Mel Carlisle. © Te Papa

Through our testing and the help of the Modular Cleaning Program, we arrived at a solution containing a mixture of enzymes which we will use to safely and effectively surface clean Poedua.  The next blog post will talk about the surface cleaning process now that we have found our cleaning agent and will include some nice images of the cleaning in progress. 

spliced image

Once a suitable cleaning formulation has been found, all the paint colours utilised in the composition are tested to make sure of its suitability. The small circular areas are the cleaned test patches, 2011. Photograph by Katherine Campbell © Te Papa

Conservation of Poedua, part 2

Poedua is an oil painting on stretched canvas, meaning the composition is painted on a fabric support which is stretched to keep it evenly tensioned, over an expandable wooden stretcher.  Canvas supports began to replace traditional wooden panel supports from about the 16th century and were the most commonly used type of support by the 18th century. 

The back of the canvas

In this photo you can see the back of the canvas support and the wooden stretcher frame which keeps the canvas taut, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227733 © Te Papa

The canvas used for this painting is probably linen (untested) and it has a twill weave, which creates a distinct texture which is visible through some areas of the paint layer.  Linen is a common support for paintings of this age, but other fabrics are also used as supports for paintings, including hemp and cotton.  The canvas is attached with small metal tacks around the sides of the stretcher bars.  We think there’s a good chance that this is probably the original attachment because there are no old holes in either the canvas or the stretcher, which can indicate that the canvas has been taken off in the past.

Here you can see a profile view of the painting showing a metal tack attaching the canvas to the stretcher, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227731 © Te Papa

The back of the canvas is no longer looking as it would have when Webber first painted it!  The canvas is made of a natural fibre which has darkened and discoloured because of the process of ageing and deterioration.  We have found the canvas to be in quite a good condition, given its age.  There are a few areas we will need to address in our treatment, including some small tears and embrittlement around the edges.  This has occurred because over time the fibres have become inelastic and snap rather than stretch.  There are some areas of damage which we can’t determine the extent of just yet because they have been covered with patches on the back.

Patch

Detail of one of the old patches on the back of the canvas. At this stage we are unsure what the patch is covering, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227733 © Te Papa

The back of the canvas is also dirty from being exposed to the world for the past 226 years!  There is a layer of dirt and some staining present, which are a combination of age-soiling and various deposits and residues.  We hope to be able to reduce some of this soiling with cleaning, but this action probably won’t dramatically change the way the canvas currently appears.  What we hope to achieve is a reduction of the dirt matter, which if left, can accelerate deterioration.

An interesting discovery for us is that Poedua has never been lined.  Lining is the attachment of a new support to the entire reverse of a painting on canvas.  Its aim is to give additional support and reinforcement to a weakened or damaged canvas.  It was a very common restoration procedure in the past and most paintings of this age have been lined at some point.  The fact that the canvas has remained unlined means that we can see the back of the original canvas and a lovely inscription, presumably by the artist himself. 

Poedua inscription

Detail of the handwritten inscription on the back of the canvas. The inscription includes information such as the subject's name, her father’s name and the location of their village. Some of the inscription is unclear and we are hopeful that cleaning will reveal it more, 2011. Photograph by Michael Hall. MA_I.227733 © Te Papa

 
 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 309 other followers