Author Archives:

DigitalNZ’s Make It Digital

DigitalNZ is a collaborative project led by the National Library of New Zealand that has been around for a few months now. They have already done fantastic things with providing tools for searching across New Zealand digital content from a range organisations, including from Te Papa’s Collections Online, as well as providing access for developers  (via an API)  to create new ways for people to engage with that content.

Today they launched the Make It Digital service. From their blog:

1. The Guides and Ask a Question sections are designed to help people who are trying to create new digital content, or digitise their stuff. A lot of you will have questions on how to go about digitisation and this is the place where you can ask. We hope that some of you will be able to share your expertise by answering others’ questions, and helping us to write and update the guides.

2. The Voting section – It’s a public forum for people to share their ideas for new NZ digital content, with voting and commenting functions. There’s some great ideas in there already that you can vote on, for example, School Journal, New Zealand music artwork and Appendices to the Journals of the House of Representatives.

As with all DigitalNZ work so far, Make It Digital has the makings of a fantastic service, and we’re really looking forward to see it grow, and watching people contribute, ask, share and create! Check it out here http://makeit.digitalnz.org/

Te Papa’s collections and digitisation

Folding camera, Thomas Girvan, 1870s

Folding camera, Thomas Girvan, 1870s

Te Papa’s collections have been built over nearly 150 years and range from miniscule lice and molluscs through to caravans, 22m long artworks and colossal squid.   The collection is estimated to be approximately 2 million artworks, photographs, objects and specimens.

Headaches
A collection this diverse can create a number of headaches when it comes to digitisation. Some objects require specialist imaging techniques. Some objects may require conservation or stabilisation first. Some objects are too large and may need to wait until the object is installed in an exhibition. Some of our collections are not yet catalogued in digital form at all, so before we can image these, we must catalogue them. And of course like most heritage institutions, we have finite resources in terms of people power, space, technology, time and… money.

Rights
Victoria has already written briefly about some of the rights clearance work that goes on helping us provide access to the collections online. Sometimes we have images for things we don’t have rights clearances for; sometimes we have rights clearances for objects not imaged. Sometimes we have permission from an artist or estate for one work, but not others. We try to align our digitisation projects with rights clearances, but the overlap doesn’t always happen straight away.

Information
Digitisation is also more than just digital photographs. We also think catalogue information, even without an image, is useful for many people, and can answer simple questions such as “how many works by artist X do you have?”. So, we are also spending time upgrading our catalogue records to make them findable and useful.

Drivers
In the past our main drivers for digitisation have been objects going on exhibition, those needed for publications or images ordered through the Picture Library. Over recent years, Collections Online has changed the way many people access our collections, and so our digitisation priorities and procedures have changed too.

We are identifying groups of objects across the collections that are suitable for imaging, and have also begun spreading the workload across the organisation.  The selection of these groupings varies from collection to collection, but usually we target significant sub-collections; or a group of objects that we have the technology and space to image now.  Usually, “inventory” work is conducted at the same time, so we can improve our information and reduce the need for additional handling of objects.

We have also been trialling some upcoming tools from DigitalNZ around digitisation selection and hope these will help us and other institutions with the future prioritisation. Watch this space.

Rainbow Springs, Rotorua, 1981, Peter Black, Gift of the artist, 1983

Rainbow Springs, Rotorua, 1981, Peter Black; Gift of the artist, 1983

Imaging
Our small imaging team work to the highest standards and with all collections (click on the image to zoom at these links James Bragge, Monrad collection, korowai).

Recently our curators and collection managers have begun imaging and have done  some great work in areas across the collections such as international history, pounamu, pacific cultures and ceramics.

Our specialist Natural Environment imaging team uses techniques such as automontage for extended depth-of-field photography to image the minute specimens in the collection. This process is time consuming but offers a view of the specimens not previously possible. It can also make some quite striking images. Other imaging techniques such as Scanning Electron Microscope are sometimes required. Currently this team is concentrating on imaging type specimens and the Botany team have done great work imaging specimens collected by Banks and Solander on Cook’s first voyage.

Always more to do
We’ve been able to add around 10000 more images to Collections Online over the last 12 months, taking the total to 40000 images. There’s still a long way to go, and some collections are better represented than others.  However, judging by the visitation to Collections Online and the feedback we are getting through the site and Twitter, many of you out there are enjoying and appreciating this new access to the collections.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 281 other followers