<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Out with the old … Conservation changes in Enriching Fashion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2011/02/10/out-with-the-old-%E2%80%A6-conservation-changes-in-enriching-fashion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2011/02/10/out-with-the-old-%e2%80%a6-conservation-changes-in-enriching-fashion/</link>
	<description>Our place, our voices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:52:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirstieross</title>
		<link>http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2011/02/10/out-with-the-old-%e2%80%a6-conservation-changes-in-enriching-fashion/#comment-9068</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kirstieross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/?p=8107#comment-9068</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe she could swim a little faster too, without the additional weight?! Kirstie 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe she could swim a little faster too, without the additional weight?! Kirstie </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirstieross</title>
		<link>http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2011/02/10/out-with-the-old-%e2%80%a6-conservation-changes-in-enriching-fashion/#comment-9067</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kirstieross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2011 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/?p=8107#comment-9067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back then it was modesty - these days its melanoma. Glad you liked the other garments in the blog. Kirstie 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back then it was modesty &#8211; these days its melanoma. Glad you liked the other garments in the blog. Kirstie </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Designer</title>
		<link>http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2011/02/10/out-with-the-old-%e2%80%a6-conservation-changes-in-enriching-fashion/#comment-8784</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Designer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 11:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/?p=8107#comment-8784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL... Maybe the removable frilly bit was for the more riskay woman of the day!

Wonder what uv protection rating the cancer society would give them?

maybe a 2000+ 

I used to wear a vest like that!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL&#8230; Maybe the removable frilly bit was for the more riskay woman of the day!</p>
<p>Wonder what uv protection rating the cancer society would give them?</p>
<p>maybe a 2000+ </p>
<p>I used to wear a vest like that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adele</title>
		<link>http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/2011/02/10/out-with-the-old-%e2%80%a6-conservation-changes-in-enriching-fashion/#comment-8783</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[adele]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 08:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.tepapa.govt.nz/?p=8107#comment-8783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two piece bathing suit... at least the Victorians had the sense to cover up their skins.. remember the bathing sheds moved down to the beach for them to reach the water, werent Men and Ladies not allowed to dip together?  If one was to show that outfit to a child today, they would not believe it was a bathing suit, probably say underwear, vest and bloomers to go under the crinoline clothes! Love the wedding clothes.. and the lovely waistcoat.. The Victorian era wore lovely clothes, not like 2011 fashion statements!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two piece bathing suit&#8230; at least the Victorians had the sense to cover up their skins.. remember the bathing sheds moved down to the beach for them to reach the water, werent Men and Ladies not allowed to dip together?  If one was to show that outfit to a child today, they would not believe it was a bathing suit, probably say underwear, vest and bloomers to go under the crinoline clothes! Love the wedding clothes.. and the lovely waistcoat.. The Victorian era wore lovely clothes, not like 2011 fashion statements!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
